Rational choice theory rational choice approach crime caus
More recently, Siegel and McCormick conclude that although some acts of lethal violence are the result of angry aggression, others seem to show signs of rational planning.
Assuming a rational basis for committing a crime overestimates the extent to which people consider the legal consequences of their actions.
Crime rose significantly.
This is what a cost-benefit analysis of crime might look like see: Becker, The subsequent attempt to expand the concept of utility to include non-financial, social and psychological aspects seems meaningful at first glance, but ultimately ends in a theoretical conception without any explanatory content.
Pros and cons of rational choice theory criminology
This is followed by a brief consideration of potential policy implications. The application of robustness of the rational choice perspective in the study of intoxicated and angry intentions to aggress. Deterrence comprises the certainty, severity and celerity speed of legal sanctions. The tenets of this theory are based on a number of assumptions about the decision-making process and behavioural motivations. This means that if offenders perceive the costs to be too high, the act to be too risky, or the payoff to be too small, they will choose to not engage in the act. Though they knew their actions were criminal, and therefore tried to avoid capture, more than half were unaware of the severity of the punishment for the offence In this way, the likelihood of apprehension or the seriousness of the sanction do not appear to cross the minds of offenders when they make the decision to offend. The essential aspect of routine activities theory is the interaction of motivation, opportunity and targets. Implications of drinking and driving law studies for deterrence research. But several types of crime are very well explained by routine activity theory:. Schreck, C. Nofziger, S. Hummer, D. This finding is supported by Burski et al. Bursik, R.
Criminology, 43 3 In consequence, it is the routine of activities people partake in over the course of their day and night lives that makes some individuals more susceptible to being viewed as suitable targets by a rationally calculating offender.
The differential risk of retaliation by relational distance: A more general model of violent victimization.
based on 87 review